Jacka vs Ngunnawal, ACT suburb comparison

Jacka for schools; Ngunnawal for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JackaNgunnawal

Overall score

Jacka

50.7/100

Ngunnawal

64.3/100

Crime rate

Jacka

15.0 / 1k

Ngunnawal

12.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jacka

35

Ngunnawal

111

Population

Jacka

712

Ngunnawal

10,957

Metric leadJacka 0Ngunnawal 82 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJackaNgunnawal
Overall score50.7/10064.3/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate15.0 / 1k12.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools66
Parks & reserves14
Walkability3.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities35111
Planning activity65
Population71210,957
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Jacka is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm, and Ngunnawal is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Jacka pulls ahead on highly regarded local schools and recognised heritage character, whereas Ngunnawal is the better pick for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves. Jacka generally means more mid-market housing value, while Ngunnawal leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Jacka if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Ngunnawal for retirees and investors.

Related comparisons