Jacka vs Ngunnawal, ACT Suburb Comparison

Jacka for retirees and families; Ngunnawal for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JackaNgunnawal

Overall score

Jacka

49.2/100

Ngunnawal

51.5/100

Crime rate

Jacka

15.0 / 1k

Ngunnawal

12.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jacka

42

Ngunnawal

123

Population

Jacka

712

Ngunnawal

10,957

Metric leadJacka 2Ngunnawal 82 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJackaNgunnawal
Overall score49.2/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10064.1/100
Crime rate15.0 / 1k12.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools66
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves14
Walkability3.0/10061.0/100
Nearby amenities42123
Planning activity67
Green cover25.4%8.4%
Population71210,957
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/109/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Jacka is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand, and Ngunnawal is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Jacka pulls ahead on highly regarded local schools and recognised heritage character, whereas Ngunnawal is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability. Jacka generally means housing toward the upper end of the market, while Ngunnawal leans toward more sought-after housing.

Choose Jacka if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Ngunnawal for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons