Forde vs Jacka, ACT Suburb Comparison

Forde for retirees and value; Jacka for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FordeJacka

Overall score

Forde

55.8/100

Jacka

49.2/100

Crime rate

Forde

7.4 / 1k

Jacka

15.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forde

597

Jacka

42

Population

Forde

4,435

Jacka

712

Metric leadForde 9Jacka 21 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFordeJacka
Overall score55.8/10049.2/100
Housing (desirability)43.3/10048.5/100
Crime rate7.4 / 1k15.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools36
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves21
Walkability56.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities59742
Planning activity16
Green cover28.8%25.4%
Population4,435712
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/108/10

Comparison summary

Forde reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Jacka is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand.

On the data, Forde is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability; Jacka answers with schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook. Forde generally means more sought-after housing, while Jacka leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Retirees and value-focused buyers may find Forde the better fit, while investors and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Jacka.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons