Jacka vs Taylor, ACT suburb comparison

Jacka for families and schools; Taylor for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

JackaTaylor

Overall score

Jacka

50.7/100

Taylor

56.7/100

Crime rate

Jacka

15.0 / 1k

Taylor

20.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Jacka

35

Taylor

152

Population

Jacka

712

Taylor

2,220

Metric leadJacka 3Taylor 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryJackaTaylor
Overall score50.7/10056.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate15.0 / 1k20.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools63
Parks & reserves11
Walkability3.0/10012.0/100
Nearby amenities35152
Planning activity69
Population7122,220
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/1010/10

Comparison summary

Jacka reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Taylor is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Jacka tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and schools and education options, while Taylor stands out for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Jacka sits in a well priced band, compared with a expensive feel in Taylor.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Jacka the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Taylor.

Related comparisons