Overall score
Casey
61.6/100
Taylor
40.4/100
Casey vs Taylor, ACT Suburb Comparison
Casey for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
CaseyTaylor
Crime rate
Casey
9.5 / 1k
Taylor
20.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Casey
123
Taylor
158
Population
Casey
6,471
Taylor
2,220
Metric leadCasey 8Taylor 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Casey | Taylor |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.6/100 | 40.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 53.6/100 | 39.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 9.5 / 1k | 20.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Walkability | 56.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 123 | 158 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 11 |
| Green cover | 22.9% | 24.0% |
| Population | 6,471 | 2,220 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Casey reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Taylor is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Casey is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves; Taylor answers with nearby cafés and amenities.
Choose Casey if you are weighing retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Taylor for investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.