Chippendale vs Woolloomooloo, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chippendale for retirees and investment; Woolloomooloo for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendaleWoolloomooloo

Overall score

Chippendale

56.8/100

Woolloomooloo

51.5/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Woolloomooloo

188.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

550

Woolloomooloo

267

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Woolloomooloo

3,792

Metric leadChippendale 6Woolloomooloo 43 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendaleWoolloomooloo
Overall score56.8/10051.5/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10047.2/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k188.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools2918
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves55
Public transport stops1219
Walkability88.0/10098.5/100
Nearby amenities550267
Planning activity2315
Green cover2.2%3.4%
Population7,8033,792
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Woolloomooloo is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Chippendale tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, while Woolloomooloo stands out for public transport access, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook.

Households prioritising schools may find Chippendale the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Woolloomooloo.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons