Chippendale vs Woolloomooloo, NSW suburb comparison

Chippendale for schools; Woolloomooloo for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendaleWoolloomooloo

Overall score

Chippendale

58.2/100

Woolloomooloo

57.0/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Woolloomooloo

188.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

533

Woolloomooloo

251

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Woolloomooloo

3,792

Metric leadChippendale 6Woolloomooloo 32 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendaleWoolloomooloo
Overall score58.2/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)4.4/1001.9/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k188.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools2918
Parks & reserves55
Public transport stops1219
Walkability88.0/10098.5/100
Nearby amenities533251
Planning activity1613
Population7,8033,792
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Woolloomooloo is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Chippendale tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Woolloomooloo stands out for schools and education options and public transport access.

Households prioritising schools may find Chippendale the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Woolloomooloo.

Related comparisons