Chippendale vs Zetland, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chippendale for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendaleZetland

Overall score

Chippendale

56.8/100

Zetland

51.0/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Zetland

89.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

550

Zetland

595

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Zetland

12,622

Metric leadChippendale 4Zetland 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendaleZetland
Overall score56.8/10051.0/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10049.0/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k89.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2914
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves514
Public transport stops1236
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities550595
Planning activity2353
Green cover2.2%5.8%
Population7,80312,622
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Zetland is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Chippendale pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and overall desirability, whereas Zetland is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Chippendale, while Zetland remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons