Clapham vs Hawthorn, SA suburb comparison

Clapham for investment and value; Hawthorn for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ClaphamHawthorn

Overall score

Clapham

37.1/100

Hawthorn

49.4/100

Crime rate

Clapham

25.6 / 1k

Hawthorn

41.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Clapham

23

Hawthorn

119

Population

Clapham

1,685

Hawthorn

2,221

Metric leadClapham 3Hawthorn 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryClaphamHawthorn
Overall score37.1/10049.4/100
Housing (desirability)47.5/10011.8/100
Crime rate25.6 / 1k41.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Public transport stops620
Walkability9.0/10069.0/100
Nearby amenities23119
Planning activity2127
Population1,6852,221
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Clapham reads as a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel; Hawthorn is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Clapham tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Hawthorn stands out for public transport access and walkability.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Clapham the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Hawthorn.

Related comparisons