Overall score
Clear Mountain
47.7/100
Draper
51.2/100
Clear Mountain vs Draper, QLD Suburb Comparison
Clear Mountain for investment and value; Draper for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Clear MountainDraper
Crime rate
Clear Mountain
48.3 / 1k
Draper
12.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clear Mountain
0
Draper
3
Population
Clear Mountain
807
Draper
695
Metric leadClear Mountain 2Draper 43 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesDraper
- Best for familiesDraper
- Best for investmentClear Mountain
- Best for best valueClear Mountain
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clear Mountain | Draper |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.7/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.0/100 | 6.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 48.3 / 1k | 12.7 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 3 |
| Green cover | 2.7% | 2.8% |
| Population | 807 | 695 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Clear Mountain reads as a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood; Draper is a sought-after metro smaller community where housing reflects strong local demand. Clear Mountain sits among greener hillside streets, while Draper keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Clear Mountain is stronger for housing affordability, overall desirability, and a larger local community; Draper answers with a quieter safety profile, plus nearby cafés and amenities.
Clear Mountain suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Draper is the stronger match for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.