Connellan vs Ross, NT suburb comparison

Ross for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ConnellanRoss

Overall score

Connellan

27.8/100

Ross

38.0/100

Nearby amenities

Connellan

17

Ross

5

Population

Connellan

371

Ross

806

Metric leadConnellan 2Ross 4across 6 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for retireesRoss
  • Best for familiesRoss
  • Best for investmentRoss
  • Best for best valueRoss
  • Best for best schoolsRoss

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryConnellanRoss
Overall score27.8/10038.0/100
Housing (desirability)59.3/10066.7/100
Schools & preschools1
Public transport stops2
Walkability0.0/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities175
Population371806
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)8/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Connellan is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Ross is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Connellan tends to lead on nearby cafés and amenities and overall desirability, while Ross stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Connellan if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Ross for investors and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons