Overall score
Mount Johns
29.8/100
Ross
38.0/100
Mount Johns vs Ross, NT suburb comparison
Mount Johns for retirees and families; Ross for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Mount JohnsRoss
Nearby amenities
Mount Johns
0
Ross
5
Population
Mount Johns
541
Ross
806
Metric leadMount Johns 1Ross 5across 6 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesMount Johns
- Best for familiesMount Johns
- Best for investmentRoss
- Best for best valueRoss
- Best for best schoolsRoss
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Johns | Ross |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 29.8/100 | 38.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 7.6/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | — | 2 |
| Walkability | 0.0/100 | 3.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 0 | 5 |
| Population | 541 | 806 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Mount Johns is a hillside smaller community with greener streets and a quieter pace, and Ross is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Mount Johns sits among greener hillside streets, while Ross keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Johns pulls ahead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Ross is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Mount Johns sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Ross.
Retirees may find Mount Johns the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ross.