Kilgariff vs Ross, NT suburb comparison

Ross for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KilgariffRoss

Overall score

Kilgariff

30.4/100

Ross

38.0/100

Nearby amenities

Kilgariff

6

Ross

5

Population

Kilgariff

551

Ross

806

Metric leadKilgariff 3Ross 32 tiedacross 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

  • Best for familiesRoss
  • Best for investmentRoss
  • Best for best valueRoss
  • Best for best schoolsRoss

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKilgariffRoss
Overall score30.4/10038.0/100
Housing (desirability)59.9/10066.7/100
Schools & preschools11
Parks & reserves2
Public transport stops32
Walkability4.5/1003.0/100
Nearby amenities65
Population551806
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/106/10

Comparison summary

Kilgariff reads as a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace; Ross is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Kilgariff tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Ross stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Ross, while Kilgariff remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons