Eastlakes vs Mascot, NSW suburb comparison

Eastlakes for families and schools; Mascot for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EastlakesMascot

Overall score

Eastlakes

53.8/100

Mascot

57.8/100

Crime rate

Eastlakes

57.9 / 1k

Mascot

58.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Eastlakes

68

Mascot

420

Population

Eastlakes

6,347

Mascot

21,591

Metric leadEastlakes 3Mascot 8across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEastlakesMascot
Overall score53.8/10057.8/100
Housing (desirability)15.8/10016.3/100
Crime rate57.9 / 1k58.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools113
Parks & reserves722
Public transport stops47136
Walkability59.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities68420
Planning activity855
Population6,34721,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/1010/10

Comparison summary

Eastlakes is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Eastlakes pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mascot is the better pick for housing affordability and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Mascot, while Eastlakes remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons