Eastlakes vs Mascot, NSW Suburb Comparison

Eastlakes for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

EastlakesMascot

Overall score

Eastlakes

47.8/100

Mascot

46.4/100

Crime rate

Eastlakes

57.9 / 1k

Mascot

58.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Eastlakes

77

Mascot

465

Population

Eastlakes

6,347

Mascot

21,591

Metric leadEastlakes 6Mascot 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryEastlakesMascot
Overall score47.8/10046.4/100
Housing (desirability)48.0/10043.2/100
Crime rate57.9 / 1k58.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools113
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves722
Public transport stops47136
Walkability59.0/10075.0/100
Nearby amenities77465
Planning activity1069
Green cover6.5%1.6%
Population6,34721,591
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/1010/10

Comparison summary

Eastlakes is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Mascot is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Eastlakes pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Mascot is the better pick for housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Eastlakes the better fit, while retirees and investors are more likely to prefer Mascot.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons