Gordon vs Darwin City suburb comparison (ACT vs NT)

Gordon for retirees and investment; Darwin City for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GordonDarwin City

Overall score

Gordon

55.0/100

Darwin City

63.9/100

Crime rate

Gordon

7.8 / 1k

Darwin City

Nearby amenities

Gordon

77

Darwin City

607

Population

Gordon

7,892

Darwin City

7,149

Metric leadGordon 3Darwin City 4across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGordonDarwin City
Overall score55.0/10063.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/1003.6/100
Crime rate7.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools52
Parks & reserves8
Public transport stops14
Walkability57.0/10091.0/100
Nearby amenities77607
Planning activity1
Population7,8927,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Gordon is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, whereas Darwin City is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Gordon sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Darwin City is further into the wider countryside.

Gordon pulls ahead on housing affordability and schools and education options, whereas Darwin City is the better pick for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities.

Choose Gordon if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Darwin City for households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons