Gymea vs Sylvania Waters, NSW Suburb Comparison

Gymea for retirees and investment; Sylvania Waters for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GymeaSylvania Waters

Overall score

Gymea

63.3/100

Sylvania Waters

54.3/100

Crime rate

Gymea

27.5 / 1k

Sylvania Waters

33.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gymea

214

Sylvania Waters

97

Population

Gymea

8,219

Sylvania Waters

3,200

Metric leadGymea 10Sylvania Waters 12 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGymeaSylvania Waters
Overall score63.3/10054.3/100
Housing (desirability)73.5/10040.9/100
Crime rate27.5 / 1k33.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools129
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves21
Public transport stops8941
Walkability57.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities21497
Planning activity1516
Green cover2.2%5.6%
Population8,2193,200
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gymea is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Sylvania Waters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Gymea pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Sylvania Waters is the better pick for excellent public transport, plus a hub for schools and preschools.

Choose Gymea if you are weighing retirees and value-focused buyers; lean toward Sylvania Waters for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons