Overall score
Hazelwood Park
54.7/100
Mount Osmond
39.7/100
Hazelwood Park vs Mount Osmond, SA suburb comparison
Hazelwood Park for retirees and families; Mount Osmond for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Hazelwood ParkMount Osmond
Crime rate
Hazelwood Park
14.9 / 1k
Mount Osmond
21.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hazelwood Park
85
Mount Osmond
14
Population
Hazelwood Park
1,953
Mount Osmond
464
Metric leadHazelwood Park 6Mount Osmond 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesHazelwood Park
- Best for familiesHazelwood Park
- Best for investmentMount Osmond
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hazelwood Park | Mount Osmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.7/100 | 39.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 29.3/100 | 44.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.9 / 1k | 21.1 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 1 |
| Walkability | 42.5/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 14 |
| Planning activity | 18 | 8 |
| Population | 1,953 | 464 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Hazelwood Park reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Mount Osmond is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Osmond sits among greener hillside streets, while Hazelwood Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Hazelwood Park tends to lead on public transport access and walkability, while Mount Osmond stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Choose Hazelwood Park if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Osmond for investors.