Overall score
Hazelwood Park
64.6/100
Mount Osmond
48.6/100
Hazelwood Park vs Mount Osmond, SA Suburb Comparison
Hazelwood Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Hazelwood ParkMount Osmond
Crime rate
Hazelwood Park
14.9 / 1k
Mount Osmond
21.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hazelwood Park
85
Mount Osmond
17
Population
Hazelwood Park
1,953
Mount Osmond
464
Metric leadHazelwood Park 8Mount Osmond 12 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesHazelwood Park
- Best for familiesHazelwood Park
- Best for investmentHazelwood Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hazelwood Park | Mount Osmond |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.6/100 | 48.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.5/100 | 51.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 14.9 / 1k | 21.1 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 37.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 1 |
| Walkability | 42.5/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 85 | 17 |
| Planning activity | 22 | 9 |
| Green cover | 15.1% | 3.5% |
| Population | 1,953 | 464 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Hazelwood Park reads as an energetic metro smaller community where cafés and local life overlap; Mount Osmond is a leafier hillside smaller community with elevated outlooks. Mount Osmond sits among greener hillside streets, while Hazelwood Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Hazelwood Park tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability, while Mount Osmond stands out for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Hazelwood Park if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Mount Osmond for investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.