Kangaroo Point vs Sylvania Waters, NSW suburb comparison

Kangaroo Point for families and schools; Sylvania Waters for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Kangaroo PointSylvania Waters

Overall score

Kangaroo Point

34.8/100

Sylvania Waters

52.7/100

Crime rate

Kangaroo Point

33.3 / 1k

Sylvania Waters

33.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Kangaroo Point

1

Sylvania Waters

95

Population

Kangaroo Point

602

Sylvania Waters

3,200

Metric leadKangaroo Point 2Sylvania Waters 63 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKangaroo PointSylvania Waters
Overall score34.8/10052.7/100
Housing (desirability)45.1/10033.5/100
Crime rate33.3 / 1k33.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools69
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops241
Walkability3.0/10049.0/100
Nearby amenities195
Planning activity315
Population6023,200
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kangaroo Point reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Sylvania Waters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Kangaroo Point tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Sylvania Waters stands out for public transport access and walkability.

On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Sylvania Waters, while Kangaroo Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons