Overall score
Kangaroo Point
34.8/100
Sylvania Waters
52.7/100
Kangaroo Point for families and schools; Sylvania Waters for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Kangaroo Point
34.8/100
Sylvania Waters
52.7/100
Crime rate
Kangaroo Point
33.3 / 1k
Sylvania Waters
33.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kangaroo Point
1
Sylvania Waters
95
Population
Kangaroo Point
602
Sylvania Waters
3,200
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kangaroo Point | Sylvania Waters |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 34.8/100 | 52.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 45.1/100 | 33.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 33.3 / 1k | 33.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 2 | 41 |
| Walkability | 3.0/100 | 49.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 95 |
| Planning activity | 3 | 15 |
| Population | 602 | 3,200 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Kangaroo Point reads as a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm; Sylvania Waters is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Kangaroo Point tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Sylvania Waters stands out for public transport access and walkability.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Sylvania Waters, while Kangaroo Point remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.