Overall score
Kingston
63.7/100
Oaks Estate
26.7/100
Kingston vs Oaks Estate, ACT suburb comparison
Kingston for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
KingstonOaks Estate
Crime rate
Kingston
18.0 / 1k
Oaks Estate
87.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kingston
664
Oaks Estate
21
Population
Kingston
6,579
Oaks Estate
375
Metric leadKingston 7Oaks Estate 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kingston | Oaks Estate |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 63.7/100 | 26.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 12.0/100 | 12.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 18.0 / 1k | 87.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 5 | — |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 2.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 664 | 21 |
| Planning activity | 1 | 1 |
| Population | 6,579 | 375 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Kingston reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Oaks Estate is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel. Kingston sits closer to the city centre, whereas Oaks Estate is in a middle-ring position.
Kingston tends to lead on a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves, while Oaks Estate stands out for housing affordability. Kingston generally means more sought-after housing, while Oaks Estate leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kingston, while Oaks Estate remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.