Overall score
Lower King
33.4/100
Napier
27.2/100
Lower King vs Napier, WA suburb comparison
Lower King for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Lower KingNapier
Crime rate
Lower King
1736.2 / 1k
Napier
12463.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lower King
9
Napier
0
Population
Lower King
1,890
Napier
269
Metric leadLower King 6Napier 1across 7 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesLower King
- Best for familiesLower King
- Best for investmentLower King
- Best for best valueLower King
- Best for best schoolsLower King
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lower King | Napier |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.4/100 | 27.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.2/100 | 21.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 1736.2 / 1k | 12463.9 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 14 | — |
| Walkability | 21.0/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 9 | 0 |
| Population | 1,890 | 269 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Lower King reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Napier is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
On the data, Lower King is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Napier answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Lower King, while Napier remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.