Lower King vs Napier, WA Suburb Comparison

Lower King for families and value; Napier for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Lower KingNapier

Overall score

Lower King

38.0/100

Napier

41.2/100

Crime rate

Lower King

50.0 / 1k

Napier

50.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lower King

12

Napier

3

Population

Lower King

1,890

Napier

269

Metric leadLower King 3Napier 42 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLower KingNapier
Overall score38.0/10041.2/100
Housing (desirability)49.9/10053.6/100
Crime rate50.0 / 1k50.0 / 1k
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Public transport stops14—
Walkability21.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities123
Green cover0.5%12.0%
Population1,890269
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/107/10

Comparison summary

Lower King reads as a slower-paced smaller community with open surrounds; Napier is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Lower King is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Napier answers with stronger socioeconomic advantage.

On balance, retirees, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lower King, while Napier remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons