Maclean vs Townsend, NSW Suburb Comparison

Maclean for retirees and families; Townsend for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MacleanTownsend

Overall score

Maclean

42.5/100

Townsend

40.8/100

Crime rate

Maclean

53.1 / 1k

Townsend

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maclean

36

Townsend

9

Population

Maclean

2,778

Townsend

991

Metric leadMaclean 7Townsend 23 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMacleanTownsend
Overall score42.5/10040.8/100
Housing (desirability)65.1/10074.2/100
Crime rate53.1 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)64.0/10064.0/100
Parks & reserves6—
Public transport stops3716
Walkability32.0/10026.0/100
Nearby amenities369
Planning activity2713
Green cover0.6%0.0%
Population2,778991
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Maclean is a regional mid-sized suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote, and Townsend is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Maclean is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability; Townsend answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Townsend, while Maclean remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons