Maddington vs Southern River, WA suburb comparison

Southern River for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MaddingtonSouthern River

Overall score

Maddington

50.6/100

Southern River

61.2/100

Crime rate

Maddington

932.6 / 1k

Southern River

855.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Maddington

163

Southern River

174

Population

Maddington

12,419

Southern River

12,852

Metric leadMaddington 2Southern River 8across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMaddingtonSouthern River
Overall score50.6/10061.2/100
Housing (desirability)33.5/10076.0/100
Crime rate932.6 / 1k855.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools73
Parks & reserves919
Public transport stops9547
Walkability46.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities163174
Population12,41912,852
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/109/10

Comparison summary

Maddington reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Southern River is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Maddington tends to lead on schools and education options and public transport access, while Southern River stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Maddington generally means more approachable housing costs, while Southern River leans toward more sought-after housing.

Retirees and families may find Maddington the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Southern River.

Related comparisons