Overall score
Mount Barker
60.9/100
Gosnells
55.8/100
Mount Barker for retirees and investment; Gosnells for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Barker
60.9/100
Gosnells
55.8/100
Crime rate
Mount Barker
29.4 / 1k
Gosnells
265.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Barker
250
Gosnells
449
Population
Mount Barker
18,330
Gosnells
21,149
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Barker | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 60.9/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.4 / 1k | 265.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 64 | 143 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 250 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 440 | — |
| Population | 18,330 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 6/10 | 1/10 |
Across states, Mount Barker is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Barker sits among greener hillside streets, while Gosnells keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Barker pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Mount Barker sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.
Retirees and investors may find Mount Barker the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.