Mount Barker vs Gosnells suburb comparison (SA vs WA)

Mount Barker for retirees and investment; Gosnells for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Mount BarkerGosnells

Overall score

Mount Barker

60.9/100

Gosnells

55.8/100

Crime rate

Mount Barker

29.4 / 1k

Gosnells

265.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Mount Barker

250

Gosnells

449

Population

Mount Barker

18,330

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadMount Barker 6Gosnells 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMount BarkerGosnells
Overall score60.9/10055.8/100
Housing (desirability)47.6/10038.2/100
Crime rate29.4 / 1k265.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools97
Parks & reserves40
Public transport stops64143
Walkability80.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities250449
Planning activity440
Population18,33021,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/101/10

Comparison summary

Across states, Mount Barker is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks, whereas Gosnells is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Mount Barker sits among greener hillside streets, while Gosnells keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Mount Barker pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Gosnells is the better pick for public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Mount Barker sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.

Retirees and investors may find Mount Barker the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.

Related comparisons