Overall score
Rankin Park
51.4/100
Wallsend
54.6/100
Rankin Park for schools; Wallsend for retirees and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rankin Park
51.4/100
Wallsend
54.6/100
Crime rate
Rankin Park
59.6 / 1k
Wallsend
59.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rankin Park
25
Wallsend
302
Population
Rankin Park
2,547
Wallsend
13,244
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rankin Park | Wallsend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.4/100 | 54.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.0/100 | 73.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.6 / 1k | 59.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 40 | 202 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 25 | 302 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 60 |
| Green cover | 28.9% | 35.3% |
| Population | 2,547 | 13,244 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Rankin Park is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Wallsend is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Rankin Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wallsend is in a middle-ring position.
Rankin Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Wallsend is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
Choose Rankin Park if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Wallsend for value-focused buyers.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.