Rankin Park vs Wallsend, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rankin Park for schools; Wallsend for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Rankin ParkWallsend

Overall score

Rankin Park

51.4/100

Wallsend

54.6/100

Crime rate

Rankin Park

59.6 / 1k

Wallsend

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rankin Park

25

Wallsend

302

Population

Rankin Park

2,547

Wallsend

13,244

Metric leadRankin Park 3Wallsend 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRankin ParkWallsend
Overall score51.4/10054.6/100
Housing (desirability)63.0/10073.8/100
Crime rate59.6 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools46
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves222
Public transport stops40202
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities25302
Planning activity1660
Green cover28.9%35.3%
Population2,54713,244
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/103/10

Comparison summary

Rankin Park is a metro mid-sized suburb with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, while Wallsend is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Rankin Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wallsend is in a middle-ring position.

Rankin Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Wallsend is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Choose Rankin Park if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Wallsend for value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons