Overall score
Rankin Park
48.7/100
Wallsend
65.4/100
Rankin Park for retirees and families; Wallsend for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rankin Park
48.7/100
Wallsend
65.4/100
Crime rate
Rankin Park
59.6 / 1k
Wallsend
59.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rankin Park
18
Wallsend
293
Population
Rankin Park
2,547
Wallsend
13,244
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rankin Park | Wallsend |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.7/100 | 65.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 66.7/100 | 66.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.6 / 1k | 59.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 22 |
| Public transport stops | 40 | 202 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 18 | 293 |
| Planning activity | 14 | 46 |
| Population | 2,547 | 13,244 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 3/10 |
Rankin Park is a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city, while Wallsend is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Rankin Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Wallsend is in a middle-ring position.
Rankin Park pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Wallsend is the better pick for parks and reserves and public transport access. Rankin Park generally means more sought-after housing, while Wallsend leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Rankin Park if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Wallsend for families and value-focused buyers.