Scarness vs Wondunna, QLD Suburb Comparison

Scarness for retirees and families; Wondunna for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ScarnessWondunna

Overall score

Scarness

43.1/100

Wondunna

35.2/100

Crime rate

Scarness

70.1 / 1k

Wondunna

69.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Scarness

47

Wondunna

10

Population

Scarness

3,646

Wondunna

3,315

Metric leadScarness 7Wondunna 21 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryScarnessWondunna
Overall score43.1/10035.2/100
Housing (desirability)62.2/10053.0/100
Crime rate70.1 / 1k69.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Weather (desirability)31.2/10031.2/100
Parks & reserves4—
Walkability48.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities4710
Green cover4.2%0.5%
Population3,6463,315
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/106/10

Comparison summary

Scarness reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; Wondunna is a more rural mid-sized suburb that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Scarness tends to lead on schools and education options, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Wondunna stands out for housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Scarness generally means more approachable housing costs, while Wondunna leans toward more sought-after housing.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wondunna, while Scarness remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons