Adelaide vs Pakenham suburb comparison (SA vs VIC)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Adelaide | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.7/100 | 74.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 8.1/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 465.6 / 1k | 94.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 12 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 23 |
| Public transport stops | 274 | 263 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4,797 | 455 |
| Planning activity | 276 | 494 |
| Population | 18,202 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 4/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Across states, Adelaide is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Adelaide sits closer to the city centre, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.
Adelaide tends to lead on public transport access and nearby cafés and amenities, while Pakenham stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Adelaide sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Pakenham.
On balance, families and investors are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Adelaide remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.