Overall score
Adelaide
64.7/100
Pakenham
74.1/100
Adelaide vs Pakenham suburb comparison (SA vs VIC)
Pakenham for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
AdelaidePakenham
Crime rate
Adelaide
377.8 / 1k
Pakenham
84.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Adelaide
4,804
Pakenham
455
Population
Adelaide
18,202
Pakenham
54,118
Metric leadAdelaide 5Pakenham 41 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Adelaide | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.7/100 | 74.1/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 8.1/100 | 81.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 377.8 / 1k | 84.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 274 | 258 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 4,804 | 455 |
| Planning activity | 341 | 494 |
| Population | 18,202 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Across states, Adelaide is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, whereas Pakenham is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Adelaide sits closer to the city centre, whereas Pakenham is in a middle-ring position.
Adelaide tends to lead on schools and education options and public transport access, while Pakenham stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, Adelaide sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Pakenham.
On balance, investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Adelaide remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.