Overall score
Clapham
43.1/100
Springfield
40.2/100
Clapham vs Springfield, SA suburb comparison
Clapham for retirees and investment; Springfield for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ClaphamSpringfield
Crime rate
Clapham
16.3 / 1k
Springfield
17.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Clapham
23
Springfield
19
Population
Clapham
1,685
Springfield
548
Metric leadClapham 7Springfield 11 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesClapham
- Best for familiesSpringfield
- Best for investmentClapham
- Best for best valueClapham
- Best for best schoolsSpringfield
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Clapham | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 40.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.5/100 | 35.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 16.3 / 1k | 17.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 1 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 23 | 19 |
| Planning activity | 21 | 8 |
| Population | 1,685 | 548 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Clapham is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Springfield is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
On the data, Clapham is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Springfield answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Retirees and investors may find Clapham the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Springfield.