Clapham vs Springfield, SA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Clapham | Springfield |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.3/100 | 34.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.5/100 | 35.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 26.1 / 1k | 25.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | — |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 1 |
| Walkability | 9.0/100 | 3.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 23 | 19 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 8 |
| Population | 1,685 | 548 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesClapham
- Best for familiesSpringfield
- Best for investmentClapham
- Best for best valueClapham
- Best for best schoolsSpringfield
Comparison summary
Clapham is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel, while Springfield is a well-connected metro smaller community with a familiar suburban feel.
On the data, Clapham is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Springfield answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Retirees and investors may find Clapham the better fit, while families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Springfield.