Dingley Village vs Mordialloc, VIC Suburb Comparison

Mordialloc for retirees and beach lifestyle.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Dingley VillageMordialloc

Overall score

Dingley Village

63.1/100

Mordialloc

66.3/100

Crime rate

Dingley Village

53.3 / 1k

Mordialloc

72.2 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Dingley Village

188

Mordialloc

340

Population

Dingley Village

10,495

Mordialloc

8,886

Metric leadDingley Village 5Mordialloc 71 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryDingley VillageMordialloc
Overall score63.1/10066.3/100
Housing (desirability)60.2/10057.9/100
Crime rate53.3 / 1k72.2 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1112
Public transport stops6257
Walkability98.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities188340
Planning activity67154
Green cover4.9%12.0%
Population10,4958,886
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Dingley Village is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Mordialloc is a coastal established suburb shaped by beach life and outdoor living. Where Mordialloc is shaped by the coast, Dingley Village offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Dingley Village pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access, whereas Mordialloc is the better pick for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability.

Dingley Village suits investors more clearly, whereas Mordialloc is the stronger match for families, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons