Overall score
Golden Square
62.9/100
Long Gully
55.8/100
Golden Square for retirees and investment; Long Gully for families and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Golden Square
62.9/100
Long Gully
55.8/100
Crime rate
Golden Square
92.4 / 1k
Long Gully
168.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Golden Square
123
Long Gully
124
Population
Golden Square
9,220
Long Gully
3,420
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Golden Square | Long Gully |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.9/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 80.9/100 | 72.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 92.4 / 1k | 168.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 7 |
| Public transport stops | 65 | 15 |
| Walkability | 82.0/100 | 72.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 123 | 124 |
| Planning activity | 134 | 32 |
| Population | 9,220 | 3,420 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 1/10 |
Put side by side, Golden Square is a regional established suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Long Gully is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace. Long Gully sits among greener hillside streets, while Golden Square keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Golden Square tends to lead on housing affordability and public transport access, while Long Gully stands out for a quieter safety profile and schools and education options.
Choose Golden Square if you are weighing retirees and investors; lean toward Long Gully for families and households prioritising schools.