Kambah vs Darwin City suburb comparison (ACT vs NT)

Kambah for families and investment; Darwin City for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

KambahDarwin City

Overall score

Kambah

76.5/100

Darwin City

63.9/100

Crime rate

Kambah

16.5 / 1k

Darwin City

Nearby amenities

Kambah

260

Darwin City

607

Population

Kambah

15,670

Darwin City

7,149

Metric leadKambah 5Darwin City 3across 8 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryKambahDarwin City
Overall score76.5/10063.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/1003.6/100
Crime rate16.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools32
Parks & reserves58
Public transport stops14
Walkability92.0/10091.0/100
Nearby amenities260607
Planning activity16
Population15,6707,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Kambah (ACT) is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Darwin City (NT) is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Kambah sits in a middle-ring position, whereas Darwin City is further into the wider countryside.

Kambah tends to lead on housing affordability and schools and education options, while Darwin City stands out for parks and reserves and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Kambah, while Darwin City remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons