Lyons vs Wagaman, NT suburb comparison

Lyons for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LyonsWagaman

Overall score

Lyons

51.5/100

Wagaman

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Lyons

52

Wagaman

178

Population

Lyons

2,219

Wagaman

2,023

Metric leadLyons 5Wagaman 4across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLyonsWagaman
Overall score51.5/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10050.1/100
Schools & preschools515
Parks & reserves54
Public transport stops68
Walkability9.0/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities52178
Population2,2192,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Lyons is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Lyons is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Wagaman answers with public transport access and walkability. On housing, Lyons sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Wagaman.

Retirees and families may find Lyons the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wagaman.

Related comparisons