Muirhead vs Wagaman, NT suburb comparison

Muirhead for retirees and investment; Wagaman for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

MuirheadWagaman

Overall score

Muirhead

47.8/100

Wagaman

46.7/100

Nearby amenities

Muirhead

55

Wagaman

178

Population

Muirhead

3,689

Wagaman

2,023

Metric leadMuirhead 5Wagaman 4across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryMuirheadWagaman
Overall score47.8/10046.7/100
Housing (desirability)76.0/10050.1/100
Schools & preschools415
Parks & reserves74
Public transport stops38
Walkability4.5/10014.0/100
Nearby amenities55178
Population3,6892,023
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/104/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Muirhead is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Muirhead pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Wagaman is the better pick for public transport access and walkability. On housing, Muirhead sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Wagaman.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Muirhead, while Wagaman remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons