Overall score
Muirhead
39.3/100
Wagaman
39.2/100
Muirhead vs Wagaman, NT Suburb Comparison
Muirhead for retirees and value; Wagaman for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
MuirheadWagaman
Nearby amenities
Muirhead
57
Wagaman
182
Population
Muirhead
3,689
Wagaman
2,023
Metric leadMuirhead 6Wagaman 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Muirhead | Wagaman |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.3/100 | 39.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.1/100 | 34.5/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 15 |
| Weather (desirability) | 9.6/100 | 9.6/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 3 | 8 |
| Walkability | 4.5/100 | 14.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 57 | 182 |
| Green cover | 6.6% | 4.1% |
| Population | 3,689 | 2,023 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 4/10 |
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Muirhead is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Wagaman is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Muirhead pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and overall desirability, whereas Wagaman is the better pick for schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability. On housing, Muirhead sits in a expensive band, compared with a well priced feel in Wagaman.
Choose Muirhead if you are weighing retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers; lean toward Wagaman for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.