North Lambton vs Shortland, NSW Suburb Comparison

North Lambton for families and investment; Shortland for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

North LambtonShortland

Overall score

North Lambton

39.3/100

Shortland

37.9/100

Crime rate

North Lambton

108.5 / 1k

Shortland

68.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

North Lambton

43

Shortland

164

Population

North Lambton

3,454

Shortland

4,537

Metric leadNorth Lambton 4Shortland 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNorth LambtonShortland
Overall score39.3/10037.9/100
Housing (desirability)65.0/10077.7/100
Crime rate108.5 / 1k68.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools154
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves34
Public transport stops4284
Walkability30.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities43164
Planning activity2115
Green cover11.9%2.9%
Population3,4544,537
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, North Lambton is a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand, and Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

North Lambton tends to lead on schools and education options, plus stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Shortland stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

North Lambton suits retirees, families, and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Shortland is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons