North Lambton vs Shortland, NSW suburb comparison

North Lambton for retirees and families; Shortland for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

North LambtonShortland

Overall score

North Lambton

42.2/100

Shortland

50.5/100

Crime rate

North Lambton

108.5 / 1k

Shortland

68.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

North Lambton

38

Shortland

161

Population

North Lambton

3,454

Shortland

4,537

Metric leadNorth Lambton 2Shortland 9across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryNorth LambtonShortland
Overall score42.2/10050.5/100
Housing (desirability)48.0/10075.3/100
Crime rate108.5 / 1k68.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools154
Parks & reserves34
Public transport stops4284
Walkability30.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities38161
Planning activity1612
Population3,4544,537
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, North Lambton is a settled metro mid-sized suburb that balances access with everyday calm, and Shortland is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap. North Lambton sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Shortland is in a middle-ring position.

North Lambton tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Shortland stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. On housing, North Lambton sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Shortland.

North Lambton suits retirees more clearly, whereas Shortland is the stronger match for families and investors.

Related comparisons