Punchbowl vs Roselands, NSW suburb comparison

Punchbowl for value; Roselands for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PunchbowlRoselands

Overall score

Punchbowl

57.2/100

Roselands

53.2/100

Crime rate

Punchbowl

53.3 / 1k

Roselands

53.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Punchbowl

227

Roselands

147

Population

Punchbowl

21,384

Roselands

12,356

Metric leadPunchbowl 6Roselands 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPunchbowlRoselands
Overall score57.2/10053.2/100
Housing (desirability)27.1/10024.4/100
Crime rate53.3 / 1k53.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools1516
Parks & reserves68
Public transport stops195150
Walkability82.0/10065.0/100
Nearby amenities227147
Planning activity2119
Population21,38412,356
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/106/10

Comparison summary

Punchbowl is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Roselands is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Punchbowl is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Roselands answers with parks and reserves and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Punchbowl generally means more approachable housing costs, while Roselands leans toward more sought-after housing.

Families and value-focused buyers may find Punchbowl the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Roselands.

Related comparisons