Overall score
Scarness
43.1/100
Urangan
38.9/100
Scarness for retirees and families; Urangan for value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Scarness
43.1/100
Urangan
38.9/100
Crime rate
Scarness
70.1 / 1k
Urangan
70.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Scarness
47
Urangan
31
Population
Scarness
3,646
Urangan
10,988
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Scarness | Urangan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.1/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 62.2/100 | 68.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 70.1 / 1k | 70.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 31.2/100 | 31.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 8 |
| Walkability | 48.5/100 | 30.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 47 | 31 |
| Green cover | 4.2% | 4.3% |
| Population | 3,646 | 10,988 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Scarness is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Urangan is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.
On the data, Scarness is stronger for a quieter safety profile, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Urangan answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves. Scarness generally means more approachable housing costs, while Urangan leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Urangan, while Scarness remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.