St Albans Park vs Thomson, VIC suburb comparison

St Albans Park for retirees and investment; Thomson for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

St Albans ParkThomson

Overall score

St Albans Park

50.0/100

Thomson

36.7/100

Crime rate

St Albans Park

33.5 / 1k

Thomson

Nearby amenities

St Albans Park

35

Thomson

91

Population

St Albans Park

4,942

Thomson

1,606

Metric leadSt Albans Park 6Thomson 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySt Albans ParkThomson
Overall score50.0/10036.7/100
Housing (desirability)81.2/10014.1/100
Crime rate33.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools39
Parks & reserves62
Public transport stops3115
Walkability30.0/10028.5/100
Nearby amenities3591
Planning activity98
Population4,9421,606
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)2/102/10

Comparison summary

St Albans Park reads as a settled metro mid-sized suburb that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible; Thomson is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by. St Albans Park sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Thomson is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, St Albans Park is stronger for housing affordability and parks and reserves; Thomson answers with schools and education options and nearby cafés and amenities.

St Albans Park suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Thomson is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons