Griffith vs Lyons, ACT suburb comparison

Griffith for investment; Lyons for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GriffithLyons

Overall score

Griffith

67.1/100

Lyons

57.0/100

Crime rate

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Lyons

17.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Griffith

214

Lyons

103

Population

Griffith

5,328

Lyons

3,271

Metric leadGriffith 6Lyons 3across 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGriffithLyons
Overall score67.1/10057.0/100
Housing (desirability)18.0/10026.3/100
Crime rate26.2 / 1k17.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools109
Parks & reserves2
Walkability100.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities214103
Planning activity114
Population5,3283,271
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Griffith reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Lyons is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Griffith tends to lead on schools and education options and walkability, while Lyons stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Griffith suits investors more clearly, whereas Lyons is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Related comparisons