Griffith vs Phillip, ACT suburb comparison

Griffith for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GriffithPhillip

Overall score

Griffith

67.1/100

Phillip

67.1/100

Crime rate

Griffith

26.2 / 1k

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Griffith

214

Phillip

913

Population

Griffith

5,328

Phillip

5,197

Metric leadGriffith 2Phillip 53 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGriffithPhillip
Overall score67.1/10067.1/100
Housing (desirability)18.0/10019.4/100
Crime rate26.2 / 1k70.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1011
Parks & reserves23
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities214913
Planning activity1110
Population5,3285,197
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Griffith is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Phillip is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Griffith is stronger for a quieter safety profile and overall desirability; Phillip answers with housing affordability and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Griffith, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons