Overall score
Lurnea
47.5/100
Prestons
57.6/100
Lurnea vs Prestons, NSW suburb comparison
Prestons for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
LurneaPrestons
Crime rate
Lurnea
168.6 / 1k
Prestons
168.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Lurnea
107
Prestons
167
Population
Lurnea
10,057
Prestons
15,694
Metric leadLurnea 2Prestons 72 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Lurnea | Prestons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.5/100 | 57.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.4/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 168.6 / 1k | 168.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 127 | 156 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 107 | 167 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 20 |
| Population | 10,057 | 15,694 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Comparison summary
Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Lurnea is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Prestons answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Lurnea generally means more approachable housing costs, while Prestons leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Prestons, while Lurnea remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.