Lurnea vs Prestons, NSW Suburb Comparison

Prestons for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

LurneaPrestons

Overall score

Lurnea

31.0/100

Prestons

44.7/100

Crime rate

Lurnea

168.6 / 1k

Prestons

168.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Lurnea

116

Prestons

186

Population

Lurnea

10,057

Prestons

15,694

Metric leadLurnea 4Prestons 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryLurneaPrestons
Overall score31.0/10044.7/100
Housing (desirability)40.8/10038.4/100
Crime rate168.6 / 1k168.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools115
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1315
Public transport stops127156
Walkability32.0/10057.0/100
Nearby amenities116186
Planning activity1026
Green cover9.7%9.0%
Population10,05715,694
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/107/10

Comparison summary

Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

On the data, Lurnea is stronger for schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook; Prestons answers with parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Prestons, while Lurnea remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons