Lurnea vs Prestons, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Lurnea | Prestons |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.5/100 | 58.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.4/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 183.0 / 1k | 182.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 13 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 127 | 156 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 57.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 107 | 167 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 13 |
| Population | 10,057 | 15,694 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 7/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Lurnea is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Prestons is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Lurnea is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Prestons answers with a quieter safety profile and schools and education options. Lurnea generally means more approachable housing costs, while Prestons leans toward more sought-after housing.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Prestons, while Lurnea remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.