Overall score
Pakenham
74.1/100
Gosnells
55.8/100
Pakenham for retirees and investment; Gosnells for families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Pakenham
74.1/100
Gosnells
55.8/100
Crime rate
Pakenham
84.3 / 1k
Gosnells
265.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Pakenham
455
Gosnells
449
Population
Pakenham
54,118
Gosnells
21,149
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Pakenham | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 74.1/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 84.3 / 1k | 265.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 24 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 258 | 143 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 455 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 494 | — |
| Population | 54,118 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Pakenham (VIC) is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Pakenham is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Gosnells answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves. On housing, Pakenham sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.
Retirees and investors may find Pakenham the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.