Pakenham vs Gosnells suburb comparison (VIC vs WA)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Pakenham | Gosnells |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 74.6/100 | 57.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 81.2/100 | 38.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 94.3 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 7 |
| Parks & reserves | 23 | 40 |
| Public transport stops | 263 | 143 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 455 | 449 |
| Planning activity | 494 | — |
| Population | 54,118 | 21,149 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Pakenham (VIC) is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Pakenham is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Gosnells answers with parks and reserves. On housing, Pakenham sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.
Investors and value-focused buyers may find Pakenham the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.