Pakenham vs Gosnells suburb comparison (VIC vs WA)

Pakenham for retirees and investment; Gosnells for families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PakenhamGosnells

Overall score

Pakenham

74.1/100

Gosnells

55.8/100

Crime rate

Pakenham

84.3 / 1k

Gosnells

265.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Pakenham

455

Gosnells

449

Population

Pakenham

54,118

Gosnells

21,149

Metric leadPakenham 8Gosnells 2across 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPakenhamGosnells
Overall score74.1/10055.8/100
Housing (desirability)81.2/10038.2/100
Crime rate84.3 / 1k265.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools47
Parks & reserves2440
Public transport stops258143
Walkability100.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities455449
Planning activity494
Population54,11821,149
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/101/10

Comparison summary

Pakenham (VIC) is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Gosnells (WA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Pakenham is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Gosnells answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves. On housing, Pakenham sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Gosnells.

Retirees and investors may find Pakenham the better fit, while families are more likely to prefer Gosnells.

Related comparisons