Overall score
Parafield Gardens
37.6/100
Pakenham
46.4/100
Pakenham for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Parafield Gardens
37.6/100
Pakenham
46.4/100
Crime rate
Parafield Gardens
46.5 / 1k
Pakenham
84.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Parafield Gardens
171
Pakenham
488
Population
Parafield Gardens
18,467
Pakenham
54,118
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Parafield Gardens | Pakenham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 37.6/100 | 46.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 50.9/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 46.5 / 1k | 84.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 9 | 4 |
| Weather (desirability) | 37.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 24 |
| Public transport stops | 73 | 258 |
| Walkability | 76.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 171 | 488 |
| Planning activity | 169 | 494 |
| Green cover | 3.1% | 4.4% |
| Population | 18,467 | 54,118 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 4/10 |
Parafield Gardens (SA) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Pakenham (VIC) is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Parafield Gardens pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Pakenham is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability. Parafield Gardens generally means more sought-after housing, while Pakenham leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Pakenham, while Parafield Gardens remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.