Overall score
Phillip
61.0/100
Wright
55.0/100
Phillip for retirees; Wright for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Phillip
61.0/100
Wright
55.0/100
Crime rate
Phillip
70.8 / 1k
Wright
20.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Phillip
933
Wright
83
Population
Phillip
5,197
Wright
3,808
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Phillip | Wright |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 61.0/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 56.0/100 | 71.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 70.8 / 1k | 20.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 11 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 51.2/100 | 51.2/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 51.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 933 | 83 |
| Planning activity | 12 | 2 |
| Green cover | 12.4% | 10.9% |
| Population | 5,197 | 3,808 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Phillip reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Wright is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Phillip tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Wright stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wright, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.