Phillip vs Wright, ACT Suburb Comparison

Phillip for retirees; Wright for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

PhillipWright

Overall score

Phillip

61.0/100

Wright

55.0/100

Crime rate

Phillip

70.8 / 1k

Wright

20.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Phillip

933

Wright

83

Population

Phillip

5,197

Wright

3,808

Metric leadPhillip 7Wright 32 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryPhillipWright
Overall score61.0/10055.0/100
Housing (desirability)56.0/10071.0/100
Crime rate70.8 / 1k20.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools113
Weather (desirability)51.2/10051.2/100
Parks & reserves32
Walkability100.0/10051.0/100
Nearby amenities93383
Planning activity122
Green cover12.4%10.9%
Population5,1973,808
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Phillip reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Wright is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Phillip tends to lead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability, while Wright stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Wright, while Phillip remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons