Overall score
Mount Melville
51.2/100
Spencer Park
55.0/100
Spencer Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Mount Melville
51.2/100
Spencer Park
55.0/100
Crime rate
Mount Melville
50.0 / 1k
Spencer Park
50.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Mount Melville
20
Spencer Park
34
Population
Mount Melville
1,007
Spencer Park
3,445
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Mount Melville | Spencer Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 51.2/100 | 55.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.2/100 | 67.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 50.0 / 1k | 50.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 6 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 6 | 13 |
| Walkability | 40.0/100 | 63.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 20 | 34 |
| Green cover | 30.2% | 7.2% |
| Population | 1,007 | 3,445 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Put side by side, Mount Melville is a hills smaller community where tree cover and calm define the mood, and Spencer Park is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace. Mount Melville sits among greener hillside streets, while Spencer Park keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Mount Melville tends to lead on stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Spencer Park stands out for housing affordability, schools and education options, and public transport access.
On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Spencer Park, while Mount Melville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.